Posted by Ian McKee on Aug 12, 2015
A recent article by journalist Nancy Jo Sales in Vanity Fair entitled “Tinder and the Dawn of the Dating Apocalypse” has clearly upset the guys running the hugely popular dating app Tinder.
This led to a slew of critical public tweets from the company’s official Twitter account yesterday and today, making the case that statistics used in the article are factually incorrect. It also suggested that Tinder had not been contacted in the writing of the article, making the case that that is what journalists generally do.
Now, I don’t want to get too bogged down in the who’s right and who’s wrong of the argument here. I haven’t looked at either sets of research which seem to form the main crux of dispute. I’m not and never have been a Tinder user (I’m married, and not part of the 1.7% of users Tinder acknowledges are married) so can’t call myself a fan of the app, and equally can’t remember ever reading Vanity Fair.…
How Microsoft’s ‘mobile first, cloud first’ strategy is encroaching this Apple fan boy’s working life
Posted by Ian McKee on Jul 28, 2015
I am an unabashed Apple fan. But I’ll never try very hard to defend Apple software. Hardware, obviously. At the operating system level, Apple reigns supreme. At the individual application level? Not so much.
I have a folder on my iPhone titled ‘Apple Cr*p’. It’s where I put all the stock Apple apps that I don’t use but can’t delete, because there are better versions of each that have supplanted them. Occasionally I’ll scroll through it and think, “why doesn’t Apple acquire all the app developer companies that have built the better apps that have led me to do this?”
Before now, I’ve come up with a list that looks a bit like this:
- Reminders = Wunderlist
- Notes = Evernote
- Calendar = Sunrise
- Mail = Mailbox (or… Accompli)
- Weather = Dark Sky
It’s not as if Apple doesn’t have the cash to acquire a few relatively small development companies. And it would make sense as an extension of the kind of developer support Apple support prides itself on.…
Posted by Richard Parker on Jun 30, 2015
Last week Wildfire was at the Future of Wireless International Conference, the Cambridge Wireless annual get together that looks at the big trends for the wireless industry from chips through to mobile operators and the businesses who rely on mobile connectivity.
With an impressive mix of speakers across the two days, the event covered all the aspects you’d expect, but with two fairly consistent (if not always stated) themes.
Day One: Wireless is dead, long live wireless
The opening session of the conference focused on the increasingly rapid rate of change of technology and the discontinuities that would change the whole market place. Apparently the average time a company spends in the S&P 500 is now 15 years, down from 67 years in the 1920s – and it gets worse. In 8 years time “more than 3/4 of the S&P 500 will be companies that we have not heard of yet”.…
Posted by Andrew Shephard on Jun 16, 2015
As I’ve stated before on this blog I’m a technology late adopter, slightly ironic in my position I suppose but there you go. I embrace new commercial and consumer technology but actually don’t like paying a premium for it. I wait until the early adopters have paid top money and the demand curve has levelled out before I get mine. However, I might be going soft, I broke with tradition this year and allowed someone to deploy technology on me physically, as an early adopter – because it just sounded cool.
Two weeks back I let a talented surgeon point femtosecond laser at my eyes to correct for the impact that years have taken on the muscles, and to improve their general suitability for the purpose of seeing things. The cool bit that got my attention? A promise of zapping two lenses in to one eye, which was originally designed a very very long time ago with just one, to give the prospect of proper near vision – so I can still see to mend fiddly things without the annoyance of glasses – in addition to having corrected distance vision.…
Posted by Kat Farminer on May 13, 2015
As someone with recent, first-hand experience of using the NHS, I have to say I was impressed. But it also left me reimagining the whole organisation in my head and how technology could make the world of difference to my experience.
Just to caveat, I’m not talking about advancing medical science here. The fact the I can have an operation, not feel a thing and wake up safe and sound the other end was mind-blowing. I’m talking about the admin of it all. I’m sure it cannot just be me that is left tearing my own hair out by the utter painful tedium that is dealing with NHS administration.
I’m not saying that technological advancement is going to change established routines overnight. But even on these brief visits I witnessed several ways I believed the process could have been sped up by embracing the digital world that most other industries adopted long ago.…